Well, the story just gets more and more embarrassing for the media as we continue to do this

Kavanaugh thing for a second time, ringing in the anniversary of the Kavanaugh hearing

by rehashing all of it.

And so it's appropriate, I suppose, that the media is embarrassing itself, humiliating

itself, yet again, because that's what it did the first time.

And so now it's going to become a tradition annually.

This is what they do.

We talked yesterday about this debunked claim in the New York Times about another alleged

sexual assault that happened 30 years ago, though, though, as I said yesterday, even if

this thing actually happened, which it didn't, but even if it did, it wouldn't be sexual

assault.

Even if it happened, it wouldn't matter.

If someone somehow forced Kavanaugh's penis into a woman's hand at a party as the story

goes, that would, if anything, be sexual assault by the person who did the forcing.

And Kavanaugh would be one of the victims of it.

But however that would work, logistically, I have no idea.

I can't even figure out what the accusation is supposed to be.

But then it turns out that the woman, the alleged victim, didn't want to be interviewed

about the incident and said she didn't remember it.

She had no recollection of it.

And yet the Times left that detail out of its report, had to go back and add in the correction.

Now the authors of the piece are trying to explain why that detail was left out.

...