I

Miss producer there we go. Hey everybody welcome back to our number two of the conservative

Daily you're supposed to do that in the in the screen. Oh, I didn't know it was in the screen

See that's what happens. We had new features. All right

Well, it's not a new feature. This is something we've been doing for a while

You just I guess you haven't been watching okay. This is Evans first time filling in for Josh and a while

So I'll let you do the intro Evan do the intro as you would have done it all right here

Are you ready? Hey everybody welcome back to the second hour of conservative daily and join us back on you screwed me up here

Max G's with our host

Joe is off for the afternoon. He's got the other things to take care of but welcome back everyone

I got stuck in your head told you you let it get your head. All right everyone everyone say good job

Evan in the comment section give him some of that words those words myself on the back thought I did great

So again as we mentioned in the first hour

Let's put up that image one again

This episode this half of the episode is brought to you by the number a 1.8 percent

And that's mask mandates were associated with a 1.8 percentage point decrease a p-value less than 0.01

In daily COVID-19 case growth rates 81 to 100 days after implementation and again full source

There and we're gonna get into that full source

We're gonna talk about what that means what this study did what this study said what the study found and

Then we're gonna ask whether we would have all done this if we had known a year ago

That masking up would only decrease the spread by 1.8 percent and again

That's not a 1.8 percent decrease. It didn't make the virus go down

...