According to Heat Street, Ontario has now passed a law that would allow the government to invade your home and strip you of your child.

If your little Billy comes home from school one day and announces he's the little Sally.

And if you have the temerity to tell him that he is not in fact Sally.

By a shockingly broad margin of 63 to 23, the Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017 passed through the Ontario Legislature.

It tells child services and judges to consider factors including race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin,

citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity,

and gender expression in removing a child from the home. Michael Kutow, who is the Minister

of Child and Family Services, was explicit in his tyranny. He said, quote, I would consider that a form of abuse when a child identify one way and a caregiver is saying, no, you need to do this differently. If it's abuse, and if it's within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops. If all of this sounds

bizarre, that's because it is. It is also fascism. To remove a child from the home because the

government disagrees with basic biology is beyond the pale of the reasonable. Unfortunately,

it's not going to be long before leftists in the United States push the same thing. The first step

on that road is the widely acclaimed spate of legislation banning so-called conversion

therapy for children with homosexual tendencies. This is not an argument in favor of the efficacy

of conversion therapy, which is iffy in even the best circumstances. But if a child is

disturbed by homosexual feelings and you bring that child to a therapist to talk it through, that

would now be considered illegal in states including California and New Jersey. As Scott Shackleford of Reason, Matt Magazine explains, quote,

bans on conversion therapy are fundamentally censorship of an idea, and there's a slippery slope

and consequences that people with narrow interest in halting abusive treatment of gay and

transgender teens simply do not grasp. This isn't a ban on particular dangerous technique like electroshock treatment, for example.

It's a ban on anything, even just speech, coming from a licensed therapist that suggests

homosexuality can be cured.

It is dangerous to allow the government to control the classification of speech and to recast

...