I'm afraid I have some disappointing news.

The three judges who made the decision about our appeal, they denied us.

We lost the appeal.

And basically, they stuck to the same thing they did the first time that Sean was owed no duty of care.

There's like 40-page decision.

If you guys want to see it, ask me in the comments, and I'll send it to you.

I'm going to pause it here just to let everybody know who may be here for the first time.

This is Dan Hartman, the father of Sean Hartman, a 17-year-old boy who died 33 days after his first shot with the Pfizer COVID shot,

who sued Pfizer and the government and had his lawsuit against the government dismissed

on the basis that the government had no duty of care towards his now deceased son.

With that preface, you'll listen to Dan explain what happened at the Court of

Appeal and then we're going to go over two portions of that ruling to illustrate the abject

insanity and the fact that the government can compel you to do things and then wash its hands

entirely of responsibility for the consequences of said compulsion.

So we're very, very disappointed.

I mean, Sean didn't have informed consent.

Neither did anyone else in Canada.

They didn't say you could die if you take the shot.

And the inserts were blank, intentionally blank so how could a

17-year-old sitting down in a chair at a community center know the possible risks or have informed

consent when the inserts were blank so yeah you did oh did, oh, Shauna, do you care?

And it doesn't matter what those judges say.

...