Ep. 306: Dworkin and the Dobbs Decision (Part Two)
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast
Mark Linsenmayer
4.6 • 2.3K Ratings
🗓️ 19 December 2022
⏱️ 53 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Continuing on Ronald Dworkin's "Unenumerated Rights: Whether and How Roe Should be Overruled" (1992) and the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2021) decision featuring guest Robin Linsenmayer.
Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion including the supporter-exclusive part three to this episode.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This episode of The Partial Exam in Life is sponsored by Givwell.org. |
| 0:04.1 | Get your first time high-impact donation matched up to $100 before the end of the year. |
| 0:16.6 | This is The Partial Exam in Life episode 306 about unenumerated rights we're going to talk |
| 0:22.1 | more about Ronald Dworkins 1992 article on enumerated rights whether and how Rochem |
| 0:27.4 | overruled and I'm sure bringing more specifics from the Dobbs v. Jackson women's health organization. |
| 0:33.8 | Court case particularly we should say a lot more about the dissent which is more of an actual |
| 0:39.3 | philosophical treatise whereas the main decision is more well that's just what the law says and |
| 0:46.1 | we've sort of laid out Dworkins point the way that we've described it so far is that of course |
| 0:51.5 | abortion is going to be covered because the 14th amendment is stated in very broad and other |
| 0:57.6 | parts of the constitution are stated in very broad idealistic terms that invite the justices to |
| 1:04.5 | not just insert their personal moral views but to draw on a moral concept of liberty of autonomy |
| 1:14.0 | of freedom and equality really are the fundamental ones to then cast a wide and changing net of what |
| 1:23.2 | is going to count as a right deserving special protections going forward but actually Dworkin gives |
| 1:29.2 | a much more sort of technical thing by just saying actually the concept of unenumerated rights |
| 1:34.4 | doesn't even make sense there's not a distinction between enumerated and unenumerated ones. |
| 1:39.9 | So that's in the fourth section I thought this was in right the first section this is like the |
| 1:45.0 | first thing he says in the whole article but start where you want to start well he's giving his |
| 1:48.9 | thesis but he doesn't defend that until section four when it comes to unenumerated explicitly |
| 1:54.4 | defend that but the first three sections mark you kind of have already summarized and we talked |
| 1:58.4 | about it a little bit just this idea that you know the Biller Rights contains a lot of concrete |
| 2:02.7 | specifications of rights but it also includes some very abstract principles and then the 14th |
| 2:07.4 | Amendment is a great example of that and that has been interpreted historically is including not |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

