meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 298: Marsilio Ficino on Love (Part Two)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 1 August 2022

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Continuing on Commentary on Plato's Symposium on Love with guest Peter Adamson. We consider F's views on beauty and fill out his neo-Platonic epistemology.

Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to the partially examined life episode 298 we've been talking about in

0:11.7

Marsilio Ficinos, commentary on Plato's symposium on Love from 1475 with our special guest

0:18.5

Peter Adamson from the History and Philosophy podcast. Peter, what is there? Some major

0:22.8

concept that we have not yet hit and this that we want to start with from your perspective?

0:28.0

I mean I think it would be worth mentioning something that I actually talk about in the book

0:32.2

you kind of mentioned at the start of part one which is that this is only one of a whole

0:37.1

series of works on love that were written in the Renaissance. Probably the most famous

0:41.7

one is by a Jewish author named Leone Eberreo which is also a dialogue about love but there's one

0:48.2

by Pietro Bembo, there's one by Pico de la Marandola who's a famous colleague of Ficinos who

0:55.4

is this young rich dude who sort of threw himself into Platonism and Kabbalah and so on and he

1:02.0

wrote a commentary on a poem that's about love and a really interesting case is Tullia de

1:07.0

Aragona so a female philosopher who also wrote a dialogue where she's talking to a male friend who's

1:14.3

a real person and that's really a really nice dialogue because it adds another layer to all this

1:22.2

neoplatonic stuff we've been talking about by having the two characters flurch and in particular

1:29.4

the guy keeps sort of pursuing Tullia so she's put herself into the dialogue as a real person so

1:36.1

the author appears in it as a character is what I mean and her friend is sort of like saying

1:41.3

roughly speaking hey we should really put all this theory into practice and she's like oh you

1:46.8

you know so she's sort of she's playing hard to get and there's a lot of humor that comes out

1:51.0

of that so that's a really nice example but it's not just that they keep coming back to the theme

1:57.2

these humanists it's also that they don't necessarily agree about the nature of love for example

2:04.5

in part one we were talking about the fact that Ficino has this very dismissive attitude towards

2:10.2

physical love and Pico defines love differently from Ficino because Ficino really defines love in

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.