Before 100 years ago, there was just no such thing as Breadwinner.

Like, there was this kind of this context of like, I leave, I make the money.

Like, that didn't exist.

What's the guys?

Jeff and Jeremy here.

Another good question today.

Now, this one, I don't, the relevancy of it is, is different in this moment than I think in normal, but I still think it's

a helpful question regardless that'll be evergreen. And the question is, what about stay-at-home

dads? Is that okay? Is that appropriate? Brandon asked this. So this is a question we're trying

to answer from our community. Could I still fulfill my God-given role as a father, staying at home

to nurture and raise our kids while my wife takes up the role of the breadwinner. Would I be giving up my responsibilities as the leader in my household? I have heard many different takes on this, and I can't figure out exactly what the Bible really says about it. That's a good question, hard question. I know a lot of people wrestle with it. I'll say one thing, and I'll let Jeremy then talk about kind of the vision I think we see in scriptures, but I'll talk about the more, what would this be,

sociological or historical perspective. And that's the fact that before 100 years ago, there was

just no such thing as breadwinner. Like there's this kind of this context of like, I leave, I make the

money. Like that didn't exist. The, the, the world of the scriptures,

the home was an economic and a familial kind of orbiting force that was all wrapped up into one,

meaning like it was just its own entity. It was its own unit. There was no one that was a breadwinner.

There was no one that was not a breadwinner. It was just a team that works and serves each other. Now there was, of course, I do think there was

structure, organization, deference, et cetera. But I really like, this is only a 21st century

question to a 21st century problem. And so I just think it's kind of useless and pointless

at some layer.

Now, you know, of just like we, and where, or here's another way to put it. I think it becomes

really problematic when you then try to go into the first century text and have an answer

...