This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

Slack.com slash DHQ.

So, for the show today, what I want to talk about is we're nearing the three-year mark

of when COVID-19 started. And when I say started, I mean quote-unquote started. When

it started to become a thing in the United States, when we started to hear these stories

about what was happening in China, our public health establishment here started to make

plans. The mainstream media started to condition the American population to fear the COVID-19

virus. We're almost three years out from when that first started. And I can't help but

sit here and wonder if we had not had the lockdowns and the mask mandates. And the vaccines

and then the vaccine mandates imposed on us by the public health establishment and the

politicians. If early treatment, you know, the names that shall not be said, hydroxychloroquine

and Ibermectin, had those treatments not been squashed by Fauci and the NIH and all of

the leftist governors who were imposing these lockdowns, we have to wonder what would

be different now? Would the outcome, the outcome would certainly be different, but how

would it be different? There are some leading scientists, some leading doctors who speculate

that eight out of 10 people who died from COVID-19 during that first six months of COVID in

2020 would not have died had they had access to early interventions and had we had a more

targeted approach to stopping vulnerable populations from being exposed to this respiratory virus.

...