Katie Kirk wanted to make the case for fluidity of gender. Instead, she made the case against abortion.

Yes, seriously. Appearing with Ellen's Degeneres to talk about her new documentary, Gender Revolution,

Katie Kirk began spouting off about gender in the womb. Gender, Kirk explained, was, quote,

really a deeply biological thing, an unintentional ringing rebuke to the gender as a social construct

crowd, she then added, just because you operate on a child and tell the child you're a certain

gender, that doesn't necessarily coincide with who that person feels he or she actually is.

This applies really to intersex children, not generally to biologically male or female

children, but Kirk forged ahead.

She said, quote, in the later stages of development, it's when the brain is wired,

and sometimes a surge of testosterone can make a female fetus feel as if that baby is male or that person is male,

and the opposite, if there's not enough testosterone.

Put aside the gender politics of this argument for just a second.

The science isn't really settled

as to how a baby is really male or female in the brain based on hormone surges science actually

suggests coric is wrong but instead focus on curich's argument that a fetus can quote feel as if

that baby or that person is a particular gender a fetus is not a clump of cells it's not a ball of

tissue it feels things.

As Ed Morrissey of Hot Air points out, quote, if we're to suddenly sensitize ourselves of the

deeply biological implications of the fetus's own perception of gender identity, can we finally

agree a fetus is an actual human with a right to its own life as well as its own gender identity?

This is where the entire logic of

leftism on abortion breaks down. The left focuses incessantly on the victim status of various

...