I am normally the type of person who tries to debunk conspiracy theories, and I imagine a lot of people in our comments section hate that.

And you're going to hate it even more as time goes on.

But in this case, this is really freaking weird.

Welcome to the Lost Debate, unconventional media for the rest of us.

I'm Robbie Gupta. And I'm Corey Breff. And welcome to our second show. Corey, what do we have in store? We've got a lot to talk about today on our second show. Coming up, we're diving into the fake photos circulating about the supply shortages. Why is President Biden keeping the JFK file secret? COVID antibodies? Are they as effective as the vaccine? And on what does it mean,

gas prices are way too damn high. But first, let's talk about the big story today that everybody

is talking about this Kyle Rittenhouse story. He's finally going to trial for some alleged

crimes that were committed last year during all the protests against police. There was a shooting

a black man in Konocia, Wisconsin. Kyle Ritten a shooting of black man in Konosha, Wisconsin.

Kyle Rittenhouse, who's not from Kenosha, Wisconsin, you know, 17 at the time, cross state

lines with an AR-15 to protect businesses from these protests.

Chaos ensued, and he ended up shooting three individuals, killing two, injuring another.

He's going on trial for murder

now, but the judge in the case is actually saying that the prosecution cannot refer to the people

that Kyle Rittenhouse shot as victims. And a lot of people are getting up in arms about that

because that same judge also said that the defense can refer to those individuals as looters

or rioters if they can actually

prove that's what they were there doing.

And I mean, on the surface, the fact that those individuals can't be referred to as victims,

that sounds kind of absurd, Ravi.

But I mean, is there more to the story here?

There is.

...