From mediators' world news headquarters in Boseman, Montana, this is Cal's We Can Review

presented by Steel.

Steel products are available only at Authorized Deals.

For more, go to StealDealers.com.

Now here's your host, Ryan Calcane.

A new study made headlines this week for its claim that eating a single freshwater fish

is on par with drinking a month's worth of contaminated water.

At least that's what you learned if you only read the headlines.

If you dig a little deeper, you find that the truth is a little more complicated, which

is exhausting, I know.

Thanks to everyone who sent this in, there's a lot of you.

This peer-reviewed study was published in the Environmental Research Journal.

The study looked at two sets of freshwater fish data.

One set of samples were collected from various water bodies in the United States between

2013 and 2015, and the other was collected from the Great Lakes in 2015.

The top line numbers are pretty darned concerning.

The study found that the concentrations of a common type of forever chemical known as

PFAS were higher in freshwater fish than in commercially-farmed fish or in seafood.

The concentrations were twice as high in the Great Lakes samples than in the samples from

across the country.

And of the 13 forever chemicals measured, all were detected in at least one fish sample.

To put these numbers in perspective, the authors compared the forever chemical levels in

...