For years, Democrats have been lying to Americans. No, of course we won't take your guns, they say.

The latest iteration of this lie, it came last week, courtesy of President Obama.

He told a gun shop owner, quote, first of all, the notion that I or Hillary or Democrats or whomever you want to choose are hell-bent on taking away folks' guns.

That's just not true. And I don't care how many

times the NRA says it. Well, that's not true. On this week with George Stephanopoulos, Hillary was

asked about the Second Amendment. Stephanopoulos, who makes out with Hillary in his spare time,

he asked, quote, do you believe that an individual's right to bear arms is a constitutional right,

that it's not linked to service

in a militia. Hillary answered, quote, I think that for most of our history, there was a nuanced

reading of the Second Amendment. That would be a no, gang. She then added, if it is a constitutional

right, if, then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulations.

But that wasn't the question.

First off, there's no if in the Second Amendment.

It exists.

It applies personally.

It always applied personally.

Only completely constitutional ignoramuses would argue that the Militia Clause makes gun ownership dependent on membership in an organized police force.

That's just dumb and historically ignorant.

But second, the question of reasonable regulation is a constitutional one.

There's no definition of reasonable that Hillary gets to define the boundaries of gun ownership.

Any more than reasonable regulations of the First Amendment allow Hillary to define the regulations of the First Amendment. To allow her that power would end in the destruction of gun rights.

And here's what she said. She said, I'm going to continue to speak out for comprehensive background

...