The New York Times has now fully embraced its role as the dog in the cartoons surrounded

by fire saying, this is fine. The New York Times, like all establishment organs, exists

for two reasons. And two reasons only. One, to prop up our sclerotic ruling class and

two, to demonize those of us who oppose it. Hence, David Leonart's recent New York

Times newsletter, this week, in which he declared, quote, strange as it may sound, the American

government can function without a healthy president. Just two and a half, three years ago,

the Times was insisting that the president was the most important person on earth, that

Trump was mentally deranged and that every second he remained in office sent us hurtling

that much further toward the end of the world. Now that Biden's in office, and it's obvious

that while the light is on no one's home, now the Times insists that the president

doesn't really matter. Sure, the president Biden might be checked out, but see guys,

the government can function without a healthy president. Can it? Inflation has hit record

highs. Crime is soaring. People can't afford groceries. Drugs and criminals are pouring

across the border, killing so many people that the life expectancy is declining. The economy

is in free fall and we're on the brink of World War III. Where do the New York Times

journals get the idea that the government can function without a healthy president? They

don't really have that idea. They don't really think that. They don't really care about

the truth at all. They just play their role and say with the establishment, wants them

to say, to prop up a system, we all know is failing until one day they can't pretend

anymore. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles show.

Welcome back to the show. Huge story that everyone is celebrating about this student who,

through hard work, has been accepted to 170 colleges and won nine million dollars in

...