If Democrats could have constructed a candidate in a laboratory designed to do two things this fall,

those things would have been one, lose dramatically to Hillary Clinton, and two, destroy the

conservative brand at the same time, which begs the question, was Donald Trump actually

constructed in a laboratory by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Barack Obama?

Polls show Donald Trump will lose by double digits to Hillary Clinton.

At this point in the 2012 presidential race, the last 10 polls in the real clear politics polling average showed Mitt Romney trailing Barack Obama by 2.2 percentage points on average.

Romney ended up losing by 3.9 percentage points.

At the same point in 2008, Senator John McCain trailed Obama by an average of

2.4 percentage points in the prior 10 polls. McCain ended up losing by 7.3%. Today, Donald Trump

trails Hillary Clinton by an average of 6.9 percentage points. Such results are mirrored in state polling.

Trump is way more unpopular than McCain or Romney ever

were. Unlike McCain and Romney, he has far less room for movement given his 100% name recognition.

And the left has already spent most of its media attention treating Donald Trump with kid gloves

for ratings purposes. They haven't even opened up their guns yet. Get ready. There's a tsunami coming.

But here's the thing.

It's not merely enough for Trump to lose.

He also has to lose after consolidating the support of all the mainstream Republicans.

So the Democrats can then claim that republicanism is really just a reflection of Trumpism,

a brand of big government politics with a real nativist streak, a white power politics

agenda, an isolationist international approach.

Fortunately for Democrats, Republican leaders are morons and are therefore falling right into

this trap in the name of stopping Hillary Clinton.

...