Yo, yo, it's about to go down.

Hello, ladies and gents, welcome to ICO 101, a crypto 101 podcast. I'm your host, Aaron Paul.

At ICO 101, we aim to deconstruct ICOs and ITOs from the ground up by answering some of the

commonly asked questions and addressing many common concerns regarding ICOs and initial token offerings.

This week, I'm going to forego that typical interview and preview format that I've been doing for the last couple of weeks and share with you some of my thoughts regarding the battles of good ICO and the bad ICOs.

But before we get started, I want to thank you for listening to ICO 101.

The reception you all have given me is more than I expected, and the growth in listens

has been encouraging to say the least, so please keep sharing.

Almost all of my time invested in the ICO 101 is a labor of love, and I appreciate all the

feedback thus far.

I will continue to work hard for you.

Currently, we release one guaranteed episode a week, but I would love to do one more show per week or every other week.

Although we have some ideas on the format and the show additions, I would welcome some show format ideas from the community.

If there is something you want to hear more of on ICO 101, then please let me know.

If there is something you want to hear less of, then please tell me as well.

You can reach me by email, aaron.pawall at Crypto101podcast.com or via Twitter at ICO 101 podcast.

I'm not a professional investment institution, bank, lawyer, or accountant, and I don't pretend to play one.

I'm not offering any legal, accounting, or financial advice, so please make sure you listen, take notes, research,

and make your own informed decisions regarding ICOs. So this week I had an interview no-call,

no-show on me. It's not the first time. No-call-no-shows, unreturned emails, and broken good faith

promises are part of any professional space. The ICO space is no different. Good faith is what

separates professional

...