meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

End the Federal Prohibition on Marijuana

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 9 March 2017

⏱️ 16 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

As long as the feds refuse to enforce marijuana laws uniformly across the United States, Rep. Thomas Garrett (R-VA) says it's time to end federal cannabis prohibition.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Thursday, March 9th, 2017.

0:06.5

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:07.8

The Federal Prohibition on Marijuana is selectively enforced,

0:11.0

and that won't change anytime soon, so it's time to give states the ultimate

0:14.9

control of the issue and end the federal prohibition. That from Republican

0:19.3

Congressman Thomas Garrett of Virginia, we spoke yesterday.

0:26.0

Republicans like to talk about federalism,

0:29.0

and it seems that in general they do support it, but when it comes to so-called vices, they don't.

0:37.0

Well, that's one of the reasons we're here.

0:41.0

There's two areas I think that the federal government's

0:42.5

created or promulgated laws that they just choose not to enforce one's

0:45.9

immigration the other's federal marijuana policy there are a couple of things

0:49.3

that work here number one we've got unnecessarily redundant government as it relates to federal versus state.

0:56.0

Number two, you've got a circumstance where, you know, if you have 30 pounds of marijuana in Colorado,

1:02.1

you run a dispensary. If you have 30 pounds of marijuana in Colorado, you run a dispensary.

1:03.0

If you have 30 pounds of marijuana in Virginia,

1:05.4

you're a drug dealer.

1:06.7

And these are under federal laws, which are theoretically uniform.

1:10.0

They've abdicated that authority.

1:11.8

You know, President Obama could have, as a matter of temporary policy, essentially removed

1:19.2

marijuana from certain elements of enforcement. He chose not to do that, but even if he had,

1:26.2

that wouldn't have fixed the statutory issue.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.