4.6 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 2 July 2021
⏱️ 27 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, welcome to a special emergency edition of O-God What Now, but for once the emergency |
| 0:10.0 | news is good news. I'm Dorian Litsky and joining me are Naomi Smith and Alex Andrey. Kim |
| 0:15.4 | Ledbetter is the new Labour MP for Batley and Span following in the footsteps of her sister, |
| 0:19.7 | Joe Cox. Alex, the Tories have lost two by elections in a row, they widely predicted |
| 0:24.9 | to win. Will Boris Johnson face a leadership challenge? |
| 0:28.5 | No, of course not. But seriously, the narrative here, and I'm reflecting, I suppose, |
| 0:36.4 | even on what we did in the panel show, is that I think that we didn't talk enough about |
| 0:44.4 | Labour actually winning, but the possibility of Labour actually winning, because I think the narrative |
| 0:48.1 | was so overwhelmingly that Labour were going to lose whether that was due to George Galloway |
| 0:55.4 | or not. And this follows, you know, Cheshire Mennamishin, which is a real upset, like is it? |
| 1:00.8 | You know what, I'm actually delighted that we've got Naomi with us today, because I was having |
| 1:09.4 | a private sort of little water exchange with Naomi three, four days ago saying I was sensing |
| 1:20.0 | something in the water that the narrative had changed a little bit, and Labour had stopped |
| 1:25.6 | trying to manage expectations quite so much, and you know, it seemed to be much closer than |
| 1:33.5 | everyone thought. And I just could feel in my waters that it had somehow changed. And that was |
| 1:41.6 | just before the handcock affair, which then hit, and I think also affected the narrative quite |
| 1:48.8 | considerably. Oh, you think it did. You think it did definitely. I do. Yes, yes, I do. I do. |
| 1:55.6 | I don't think it had a massive effect, but I do think it had an effect in that all this stuff, |
| 2:02.5 | like I've said before in the show, people may not pay attention to the detail, but in general, |
| 2:08.5 | stuff that makes people pay attention to politics, it makes them turn that way and look that way |
| 2:16.3 | is generally speaking quite good for the party that's not involved in whatever scandal is going on, |
| 2:25.5 | and quite bad for the party that is. So it's in a very general way, but yes, I think it does have |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Podmasters, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Podmasters and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.