Elon's Exit from Trump Administration + Amanda Litman on Recruiting the Next Democratic Leaders
The Chuck ToddCast
iHeartPodcasts
4.0 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 2 June 2025
⏱️ 79 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Chuck Todd reacts to Elon Musk leaving the Trump Administration and discusses the valuable lessons to be learned from Elon’s tenure. Chuck also reacts to the recent pardons by Donald Trump and explains why they are bad for the country. Then he discusses the problems with the “big, beautiful bill”.
Then, Chuck is joined by Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run For Something, to discuss the future of Democratic leadership and the urgent need to recruit a new generation of candidates. They examine how Republicans, following the lead of Newt Gingrich’s GoPAC, have outpaced Democrats in preparing talent for public office — and why the Democratic bench remains so thin.
Litman shares insights into the challenges young progressives face, from lack of institutional support to financial and family pressures. They discuss the messy but well-intentioned efforts like David Hogg’s DNC initiative, the communication gap with younger voters, and why the information ecosystem is reshaping political engagement.
Together, they explore the mechanics of candidate recruitment, debates over ideological litmus tests, and how Run For Something navigates hot-button issues like trans rights and independent candidacies. From socioeconomic diversity in elected office to the underrepresentation of renters and working-class Americans, this conversation is a candid look at how Democrats can rebuild from the ground up — and what success might look like in the 2026 midterms.
Finally, in “Ask Chuck,” Chuck digs into the mailbag to answer one of the biggest questions about the state of politics.
00:00 - Chuck recaps his weekend
06:26 - Elon’s Exit from Trump Administration
14:43 - Reaction to Trump’s pardons
21:49 – Amanda Litman joins the Chuck Toddcast!
22:19 – What is “Run For Something”?
24:19 – Newt Gingrich started GoPAC to prep candidates on the right
25:19 – The DNC dropped the ball on prepping candidates
27:34 – Emily’s List was good for candidate training, but only for women
29:04 – There are very few young elected Democrats
30:04 – David Hogg’s DNC effort is a noble one, but messy for the DNC
32:19 – The generational divide in the Democratic party
33:49 – Democrats need younger leaders to speak to younger voters
34:49 – The Republican party changed drastically in ten years
35:49 – Voters under 35 have seen a lot of government failure
37:49 – Voters receive their information so differently now
39:04 – What is the process for recruiting and training candidates?
42:49 – Is there an ideological litmus test for prospective candidates?
44:04 – Trans issues have been very challenging for progressives
45:49 – What if a candidate's passion issue isn’t a voting issue?
47:04 – Will “Run For Something” recruit and run independent candidates?
49:49 – Could we see a lot of former federal employees run for office?
51:49 – Will Run For Something get involved in debates about updating the democracy
53:19 – Legislators should be paid more
55:19 – Lack of money and kids are a huge impediment to candidates under 40
57:19 – We need more socioeconomic diversity in elected office*
59:19 – Renters aren’t represented in Congress*
61:04 – The Democrats have become the “presidency or bust” party*
63:04 – If you want to improve the Democratic brand, you have to change the politicians
65:19 – What does success look like in 2026 midterms?
67:22 – “Ask Chuck”
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Well, good morning. Happy Monday. At least I'm hoping that's when you're listening to this. I'm |
| 0:08.7 | taping on a Sunday evening here. I've got give you a quick rundown of everything I've got. |
| 0:13.6 | I'll have a little open here for you about the end of Elon Musk and Washington. I'll get to that |
| 0:18.6 | in a minute. My guest today, Amanda Lipman, |
| 0:21.9 | she runs an organization called Run for Something. It's geared more towards Democrats or people |
| 0:27.6 | on the left side of the aisle, although they will work with people that are thinking about |
| 0:32.4 | running as independence. It's basically an organization that, number one, is trying to encourage younger people to run for office, but also trying to be a resource for people that don't. |
| 0:44.1 | Because if you're younger, you usually don't have as much of a network. |
| 0:47.3 | You may not have as many rich friends. |
| 0:49.1 | You get the picture here. |
| 0:51.5 | And you'll hear me make these comparisons during the interview back in the 80s and 90s, |
| 0:57.0 | you had GoPack on the right. |
| 0:58.4 | That was a similar organization that was trying to get conservatives who were not connected, |
| 1:04.0 | essentially with the tools to figure out how to run for local office. |
| 1:08.7 | And this is, you know, maybe Emily's list has, you'll hear a little bit of |
| 1:13.1 | that. But it's about trying, and clearly the Republicans have done a much better job over the last |
| 1:18.1 | 20 or 30 years, encouraging folks to run for local office. Democrats have been a bit too focused on the |
| 1:24.5 | presidential big, big offices and don't think about the smaller stuff |
| 1:29.2 | than they were, you know, arguably it's why they're getting crushed on the issue of schools |
| 1:34.2 | and funding of schools and the privatization of the public school system. |
| 1:38.9 | You've had a lot more activist parents on the right get involved in school board politics, and you've had activist parents on the right, get involved in school board politics, and you've |
| 1:46.2 | had activist parents on the left, pure and simple. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

