The point is, you just have a reconstitution, David, and I think you're being very kind.

I call it a regurgitation, okay?

And what you see here, these are numbers, and I'll get to them.

This is supposed to be for minority votes.

This is called a Keshal factor, a Python factor.

And I hope these people do not, you know, understand how some of the data is being misused

here, and I'll come back to it.

This fingerprint is apparently an imprimatur for when fraud is taking place, okay?

But the bottom line is, this was all branded as a very, very high-falutin term called

Kinematic Artifact Detection.

And I think people funded this Kinematic Artifact Detection.

Bottom line is, it's simply a reconstitution of the data in the Canvas report.

That's my point, Joe, and David.

There are people who do serious work.

When I see the word Kinematic, it's coming out of, you know, kinematics, okay?

There's no kinematic here.

This is purely...

Yeah, and the reason why I wanted to ask you that question, Dr. Shiva, is for this reason.

When I think of Jeffrey Filia Pulitzer's work on what it's talking about kinematics,

we've been told about paper analysis, paper analysis, and it appears that what you're

showing us here has nothing to do with paper analysis, but it's misleading because we've

been told that the Kinematic Artifact Detection has to do with the examination of the paper.

...