meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Effectively Wild Episode 2270: Trouble With the Curved Bat

Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley

Sports, Baseball

4.72.7K Ratings

🗓️ 15 January 2025

⏱️ 94 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

EWFI
Ben Lindbergh and Meg Rowley banter about a new escalation in “breakout” creep, the Blue Jays signing Jeff Hoffman, risk tolerance in transactions, alternate spellings of names, Roki Sasaki’s effect on the market for international amateur free agents, another example of a team offering a higher salary in arbitration than a player requested, Mets owner Steve Cohen’s financial returns, Nick Castellanos on MVP Jose Iglesias, and a 19th-century curved-bat idea (1:08:44), plus (1:22:40) a Stat Blast on the players who’ve appeared in the most distinct team matchups.

Audio intro: Justin Peters, “Effectively Wild Theme
Audio outro: Harold Walker, “Effectively Wild Theme

Link to breakouts post
Link to Jeff on HoF artifacts
Link to Clemens on Hoffman
Link to MLBTR on Hoffman
Link to Hoffman press release
Link to Madisynn clip
Link to MLBTR on Sasaki
Link to article on Sasaki effects
Link to Flanagan arb post
Link to WSJ on Cohen
Link to Castellanos clip
Link to banana bat article 1
Link to banana bat article 2
Link to banana bat article 3
Link to banana bat article 4
Link to banana bat article 5
Link to Alan Nathan physics site
Link to bat boning wiki
Link to Stat Blast sheet 1
Link to Stat Blast sheet 2
Link to Ben on Stairs
Link to Ryan Nelson’s Twitter
Link to MiLB draft data
Link to EW gift subscriptions

 Sponsor Us on Patreon
 Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com
 EW Subreddit
 Effectively Wild Wiki
 iTunes Feed (Please rate and review us!)
 Spotify Feed
 Facebook Group
 Bluesky Account
 Twitter Account
 Get Our Merch!

Source

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

How can you not be pedanted?

0:07.0

A stab blast will keep you distracted.

0:11.0

It's a long slog to death, but the shore to make you smile.

0:18.0

This is effectively why? This is effectively why? Hello, this is Effectively Wild, this is Effectively Wild, this is Effectively Wild.

0:30.1

Hello and welcome to episode 2270 of Effectively Wild, a Fangraphs baseball podcast brought to you by our Patreon supporters.

0:37.0

I'm Meg Rowley of Fangraffs, and I'm joined by Ben Lindberg of the Ringer.

0:39.9

Ben, how are you?

0:40.8

I'm enraged.

0:42.1

Oh.

0:42.9

Can't you tell this is my enraged voice?

0:45.3

This is what I sound like when I'm enraged.

0:47.8

MLB Network, the network whose airwaves I appeared on last week, turned right around and chose violence. They heard my rant

0:57.0

about breakout players and the definition of breakouts last week. And they decided to twist the

1:04.2

knife. MLB Network's social media team put out a post entitled MLB.com's breakout players to watch in 2025. This was just this

1:15.9

week. Now, I corresponded with someone at MLB.com who denied all responsibility for this list and

1:24.2

suggested that MLB network has its own social media people and that they were

1:29.0

freelancing here.

1:30.4

It's not entirely clear to me what the sourcing for this is because some of the players

1:34.5

who appear on this purported MLB.com breakout players to watch list did appear on the breakout

1:41.5

article that I ranted about last week, but others did not and do not

1:46.6

and don't appear to be on any MLB.com actual article of breakout. So I don't know what this is

1:52.8

other than, I guess, engagement farming slash rage baiting. And I took the bait. So here's who we have. It's one of these Instagram posts that's

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.