Effectively Wild Episode 2189: Don’t Sell Umpires Short(s)
Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast
Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley
4.7 • 2.7K Ratings
🗓️ 12 July 2024
⏱️ 101 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary

Ben Lindbergh and Meg Rowley banter about homerless White Sox second basemen, the recent history of teams with homerless positions, and the upsides and downsides of the trend toward focusing on present-season performance in All-Star selections, then (37:11) answer emails about an award for utility players, a player’s debut age matching his debut number, whether an infielder could rob a home run, whether fatigue would make a four-player batting order of stars worse than a regular, nine-player lineup, whether championships reside with a city or a franchise, whether umpires could wear shorts, the definition of a “clean inning,” what it means for a throw/tag to be “not in time,” and the requirements for breaking out of a slump, plus closing banter (1:33:23) about Paul Skenes as an All-Star starter.
Audio intro: Alex Ferrin, “Effectively Wild Theme”
Audio outro: The Shirey Brothers, “Effectively Wild Theme”
Link to 2B HR leaderboard
Link to White Sox 2B
Link to 2B projections
Link to White Sox 2B tweet
Link to Neil Paine’s Substack
Link to Neil on All-Stars
Link to Neil graphic
Link to ASG roster rules story
Link to WAR and ASG story
Link to 1989 Canseco/Schmidt story
Link to Reddit post
Link to Pujols/Miggy ASG
Link to Castro selection story
Link to Castro record tweet
Link to debut age/number sheet
Link to Kenny Jackelen’s Twitter
Link to HR hang time comment
Link to sprint speed leaderboard
Link to Elly speed quote
Link to 1917 Stanley Cup info
Link to World Series doc thread 1
Link to World Series doc thread 2
Link to 2019 umpire manual
Link to umpire shorts forum post
Link to EW on pants-splitting
Link to Dickson on “clean inning”
Link to Pudge/Eno underwear ad
Link to Julio power slump story
Link to Friends hair scene
Link to NL pitcher WAR
Link to Skenes gamer
Link to Jones max-effort story
Link to listener emails database
Link to ballpark meetup forms
Link to meetup organizer form
Sponsor Us on Patreon
Facebook Group
Twitter Account
EW Subreddit
Effectively Wild Wiki
iTunes Feed (Please rate and review us!)
Get Our Merch!
Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Upster Staps in Entry, they won't be a lot to me. |
| 0:04.7 | That's why I love is all. |
| 0:07.7 | Special kids in three series, |
| 0:09.3 | pitching in peer poetry. |
| 0:10.9 | That's what I'm a baseball. |
| 0:14.8 | Hello and welcome to episode 2189 of Effectively Wild, |
| 0:19.4 | a Baseball podcast from fan graphs presented by our Patreon supporters. I am Ben Lindbergh of the |
| 0:24.7 | ringer joined by Meg rally of fan graphs. Hello Meg. |
| 0:27.6 | Hello. Let me tell you about a new little statistical quirk I'm tracking for the rest of the season or for as long as it remains true. |
| 0:35.6 | It's in the genre of White Sox fail facts so we're tracking obviously everyone's tracking just how bad will the white socks be and the answer so far very bad |
| 0:47.4 | Everyone the entire nation there's not a single person in the United States just not like those white socks I got to keep an eye on them. |
| 0:53.3 | We're all glued to our tickers just trying to find out whether the white socks will lose and |
| 0:58.0 | usually they come through in that respect and they're 27 and 68 now. So that is a 284 winning percentage. It's been worse. That's actually better than it's been. |
| 1:11.1 | Maybe they should just switch to losing percentage instead of providing winning |
| 1:15.7 | percentage for the white socks because it sounds more impressive instead of saying a |
| 1:19.6 | 284 winning percentage you could say a 716 losing percentage. |
| 1:24.3 | And that sounds, you know, better somehow it's a bigger number. |
| 1:27.6 | Well, regardless, they are on pace for 116 losses and so we'll all be tracking that as they try to avoid |
| 1:39.7 | setting a new record for futility for losses in the season despite the fact that they're probably |
| 1:44.0 | about to trade two or three of their best players potentially later this month. |
| 1:48.4 | But here is just the white socks in microcosm, a tiny little stat that stands for the holistic failure of the squad. Second |
| 1:57.6 | baseman for the white socks have not homered yet. White Sox second baseman are homerless this season. Anyone who has |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

