meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Reasonable Faith Podcast

Dr. Craig Responds to Ken Ham

Reasonable Faith Podcast

William Lane Craig

Christianity, Philosophy, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality

4.71.5K Ratings

🗓️ 8 February 2021

⏱️ 28 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dr. Craig addresses criticism leveled at him from Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Bill, we've been doing these podcasts for a long time and we've always kept talk of

0:24.0

young earth and the age of the earth, the age of the universe, at a minimum. The reason

0:29.7

being is because you've always held that it's not any central of the Christian faith,

0:35.7

but a peripheral room to disagree and so on. And so we've avoided it. For the most part,

0:44.0

I talked about it a little bit. We've avoided Ken Ham, who has made some derogatory remarks

0:51.2

toward you in the past. And then he did, again, recently Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis. They're a young

0:58.7

earth creationist organization. I think the main reason that Josh Swamadas wanted to do the podcast

1:06.8

with you is because he wanted you to respond to some of the comments. In particular, he called you

1:14.1

arrogant in your handling of God's word. Yes, he accused me of pseudo-intellectual arrogance and

1:22.8

mocking God's word. And I think those are very, very serious charges to level against another person.

1:30.8

As did Josh, and so he wanted me to respond to those. And I differentiated Kevin between

1:39.6

criticizing a person's view and criticizing a person's character. And I certainly think that my

1:47.6

views are open game for anyone to criticize. But when it comes to personal attacks on character,

1:56.5

I think that's a really serious matter because if what he was saying is true, I shouldn't be

2:04.2

in Christian ministry. As I said, if I believed for a moment that I was arrogant and that God was

2:11.4

opposing me as he opposes the proud, I would step back from ministry. On the other hand, I really

2:18.8

agreed with Ken Ham in the point that we should never let our affection or respect for another

2:28.7

Christian made that person's views immune from criticism. No matter how much we appreciate

2:37.7

another person, if that person is guilty of serious doctrinal mistakes, then we need to identify

2:47.7

to refute and if possible to correct those mistakes. And so no one's views are immune from criticism.

2:58.7

I'll tell you Bill, it's almost a trick question because it puts you in a position to say,

3:04.9

I'm not arrogant. In fact, I'm very humble.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from William Lane Craig, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of William Lane Craig and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.