meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Waves: Gender, Relationships, Feminism

DoubleX Gabfest: The Give Your Baby a Spear Edition

The Waves: Gender, Relationships, Feminism

Slate Podcasts

Health & Fitness, News Commentary, Society & Culture, Sexuality, News

4.2897 Ratings

🗓️ 2 May 2013

⏱️ 48 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Listen to Slate’s show about breast cancer awareness, sympathy for the Boston bomber and Nicholas Day’s new book, Baby Meets World.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening ad-free on Amazon Music.

0:05.7

The Double X Gab Fest is sponsored by Audible.com, a leading provider of spoken audio information and entertainment.

0:14.0

Listen to audiobooks whenever and wherever you want.

0:17.1

Get a free book when you sign up for a 30-day free trial at audiblepodcast.com slash XX. Welcome to the Double X-Gab Fest for Thursday, May 2nd, the Give Your Baby a Spear Edition. I'm Hannah Rosen, editor at Double X. I'm joined in the New York studio by Seth Stevenson, a writer for Slate. Hi, Seth. Hi, Hannah. And Noreen Malone of the New

0:38.2

Republic. Hi, Noreen. Hey, Hannah. Our three topics today are, first is breast cancer awareness.

0:43.7

Has it done more harm than good? Second, are the many fans and defenders of Jokar Tarnayev,

0:50.2

the young Boston bomber. Why did so many people feel sorry for the kid, as they say? And third,

0:55.8

we're going to have an interview with author Nicholas Day, a regular contributor to Slate on All Things Baby,

1:00.5

and author of the new book, Baby Meets World. So let's start with our first topic, breast cancer

1:04.9

awareness. There was a cover story in the New York Times magazine this month, actually last weekend,

1:10.1

which takes on breast

1:11.0

cancer awareness and pink ribbon culture and wonders if maybe it's done more harm than good. The story

1:16.1

looks specifically at the idea of early detection, which studies increasingly show does not

1:21.0

decrease death rates and may lead to a lot of unnecessary treatment. I have to say, I really thought

1:25.8

this was an excellent, brave, and very

1:28.4

clear medical piece. I know we've had bits and pieces of this argument out there in the culture

1:32.2

by Barbara Erin Reich. There was also a book about pink ribbon culture, which I'll include a link to.

1:37.1

But I think the author of Peggy Ornston, she did an amazing job of first weaving in her own story

1:41.4

because she did have breast cancer detected early. And yet here she was saying she didn't actually know if that early detection had made any difference. And also, it was brave of her not just to take on a big lobby, but a fundamental way of thinking among women that they're survivors and that they should have hope. Noreen, did you find the statistics convincing? We'll just start with the sort of small, like, you know, the new research about mammography and whether it does any good and if it overdiagnoses. Did she convince you on that point?

2:08.1

She did. And just to quickly run through the stats, she set it up three pairs of European countries. And in each pair, mammography was introduced 10 to 15 years later. And in the one where it was

2:20.2

introduced 10 to 15 years later, there was really no difference in mortality. So the takeaway there

2:25.0

is that early detection just means that you maybe know about it earlier. Wasn't that interesting?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.