What you know, alibiers, welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and Alibis.

I'm Gigi.

Good to have you here.

It is still Saturday, September 27th.

We are going to read the order denying Donna Adelson's post-trial motion for a new trial.

This was filed on September 25th at 1126 a.m.

No new trial for you, Donna, which I'm sure has ruined her

weekend. Let's jump right in. This cause came before the court for consideration of the

defendant's motion for leave to interview jurors, motion for a new trial, and renewed motion

for judgment of acquittal, all filed September 15, 2025.

The court, having reviewed the defendant's motions, the court filed trial record and being duly

advised in the premises hereby fines as far as the motion for leave to interview jurors.

Defendant seeks to interview two members of the jury

in her case, jurors five and seven. In moving to interview jurors, the motion must set forth

allegations that are not merely speculative, conclusory, or concern matters that in here

in the verdict itself. They cite Foster v. State. Consequently,

juror interviews are not permissible unless the moving party has made sworn allegations that,

if true, would require the court to order a new trial because the alleged error was so fundamental

and prejudicial as to matters that in here in the verdict itself,

and they cite Foster v. State.

Consequently, juror interviews are not permissible unless the moving party has made sworn allegations

that, if true, would require the court to order a new trial because the alleged error was so fundamental and prejudicial as to v.

...