Last Friday, a rather unexpected decision came down regarding Donald's sentencing in the election interference case.

Just to remind you of the timeline here, Donald was convicted in May of 2024 on 34 felony convictions.

The original sentencing date was supposed to be July 11th, but this was postponed by Justice Juan Mershan after the

corrupt illegitimate supermajority of the Supreme Court handed down its ruling on presidential

immunity. So sentencing was set again for September 18th. That came and went, and it was set again for November 26. This too was postponed

indefinitely on November 22nd. So last week's announcement that Justice Mershahn was actually

ready to sentence the convicted criminal really did come as a surprise, not least of which to Donald, who hasn't been taking it well.

Let's check out this clip, shall we?

This week, the judge overseeing Donald Trump's criminal fraud case in New York

ordered the incoming president to be sentenced next Friday, January 10th, which, if you're

doing the math, is just 10 days before he takes office.

Now, in doing so, Judge Juan Mershan rejected Trump's combative last ditch attempt to forego

sentencing and dismiss the case altogether.

Mershant said that presidential immunity does not extend to a president-elect who is not in office yet.

But he also ruled out any sentence of incarceration. Instead, he suggested

he will order an unconditional discharge, that is, Trump won't face jail or probation or any other

punishment. And given the crime here, that would be pretty unusual under any other circumstance.

In fact, the New York Times review of the 30 felony false records convictions in Manhattan since 2014

revealed that no other defendant received an unconditional discharge.

They instead received jail and prison sentences, probation, conditional discharges, community service, or fines.

Hmm.

Now, if you'll remember, the first reason Justice Mershaw gave for postponing sentencing back in July

...