meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Does the Supreme Court Need Fixing?

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 October 2021

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

There are many ideas for how to fix the Supreme Court. At Cato's recent Cato Club event, Ilya Shapiro said it's far from clear that it needs fixing at all.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Thursday, October 21st, 2021.

0:07.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.3

Ideas about how to fix the Supreme Court very widely from term limits to expanding the size of the court.

0:15.0

Does the Supreme Court even need fixing?

0:18.0

At the Cato Club event held earlier this month, Cato's Ilia Shapiro offered some lessons for thinking about the High Court.

0:24.3

Well the Supreme Court begins its new term next week and you're hearing a lot as

0:29.0

Sally mentioned about how the court needs to be reformed in various ways to maintain its legitimacy.

0:35.2

Term limits, adding justices for political reasons, court packing, and more technical proposals

0:41.0

have been bandied about.

0:43.2

There's even a presidential commission,

0:44.8

as I said, as Sally said, at which I testified this summer,

0:48.6

with a report due out right before Thanksgiving.

0:51.3

So right after you have your turkey,

0:52.7

I'm sure that report will help you have a nap.

0:56.5

But it's not at all clear that the court needs fixing.

0:59.8

Last term was supposed to be a coming out party

1:02.4

for the new six to three hyper

1:04.3

conservative court but was marked largely by surprising unanimity and never

1:10.0

before seen alignments of justices. Yet the last few years have shown that the court

1:16.2

is now covered by the same toxic cloud that's enveloped the rest of our public discourse.

1:21.9

Although it's still respected than most institutions, it's

1:25.2

increasingly viewed through a political lens. Given the controversy over the last

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.