meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Does Nadine Dorries have a point?

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 28 August 2023

⏱️ 16 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Nadine Dorries resigned from Parliament over the weekend, writing in a letter to Rishi Sunak that the Conservatives have been ‘corrupted’, and accusing the Prime Minister of ‘opening the gates to whip up a public frenzy against one of his own MPs’. Is Dorries, at least in part, right?

James Heale speaks to Fraser Nelson and Kate Andrews.

Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of Unrivaled Authority.

0:06.1

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12-week subscription in print and online

0:11.7

and get a £20 Amazon gift voucher absolutely free. Go to spectator.co.uk slash summer.

0:22.8

Hello and welcome to Coffee House shots. I'm James Heel and I'm joined today by

0:26.3

Fraser Nelson and Kate Andrews. Now first of all the big story of the weekend Fraser

0:30.2

was Nadine Dorries' resignation, she wrote a 1800-word letter. You were an article about this

0:35.0

over the weekend. Tell us what you think of her resignation. Well of course she resigned in

0:39.6

inverted comments several months ago. She wanted to wait until Saturday to give a story for the

0:43.5

Sundays. I also note she's got a new book coming out to go inside of the by-election. It seems

0:48.3

to be some strange conspiracy theory that Boris Johnson was assassinated in the title of her book.

0:54.3

Now thing is Nadine Dorries is one of these people who makes parliaments a more colorful place.

0:59.2

I shared some of her criticisms about Rishi Tuneck. It's the Tory party has got an embarrassing

1:04.8

lack of vision right now. It's being led by somebody who lost a leadership contest and who

1:09.6

was falsely trying to claim credit for falling inflation. I agree with her on all of those things

1:14.5

but there are three areas where fundamentally does agree with her. One is to claim that a cabal of

1:21.6

Tuneckites or a cabal of anybody, somehow a defernistrated Boris Johnson. We can all remember the

1:26.9

circumstances in which his government exploded and we did so because he became the first prime minister

1:32.2

in British history who couldn't find enough people to serve in his government. It was a mass

1:37.6

protest by the parliamentary party, all of whom just couldn't take any of a disorder anymore.

1:43.4

So if Nadine Dorries wants to go after people, he should really go after the dozens and dozens

1:48.7

of Tory MPs who either resigned or refused to serve. That's why he quit. Secondly, the idea of

1:55.2

calling a bi-election I think is just a monstrous act of vanity. I'm a bit old-fashioned here.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.