Bill this topic is good timing you've been studying this again as you're writing your systematic

philosophical theology. Give us an overview please. Well I'm currently working on the

Doctrine of Christ, which is called Christology and the doctrine of Christ is traditionally composed of two parts.

One is on the person of Christ and the other is on the work of Christ. The person of Christ asks who is Jesus Christ.

The work of Christ asks what did he do on our behalf to win our salvation. And so I have been

recently writing on the person of Christ the central issue of which is the incarnation. How can one person, Jesus Christ, be both

God and man.

By the way you have a longer lecture on this topic on the Reasonable Faith YouTube channel

that people can check out.

But let's look at some clips from W Robert Godfrey's lecture on this topic. Here's clip number one.

Monothelitism was the sort of last issue in the question of how the human and

divine nature's related to one another in Jesus.

The Church had reached this consensus at Calcedon, 451, that Jesus was one person

uniting in himself two full and complete

natures, a complete divine nature

and a complete human nature so that he was fully

human and fully divine.

Wasn't half human and half divine. He's fully human and fully divine. He's fully human and fully divine.

He said fully God and fully man, Bill. We're often taught that he was 100% God and 100% man.

Is that logically problematic?

I think the problem is that that is misleading, Kevin.

And I think that Godfrey did a good job of explaining what he meant.

...