meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Dershow

Does affirmative action discriminate against Asians

The Dershow

Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media

News, Politics

4.41.9K Ratings

🗓️ 2 June 2022

⏱️ 31 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the Dershow. Today I want to talk about affirmative action, particularly

0:05.8

race-specific affirmative action. The United States Supreme Court has before it a very

0:10.6

interesting case growing out of my own university, the one I taught at 50 years. The claim

0:17.7

by Asian American applicants and others litigating on their behalf is that Harvard's admission

0:26.9

process by discriminating in favor of African American and certain other ethnic groups implicitly

0:34.8

discriminates against Asian Americans. In other words, by putting a floor below which African

0:42.8

American admissions can't go, they in fact impose a ceiling on the number of Asian Americans

0:48.9

who will be admitted. Now, African Americans say historically they've been discriminated

0:53.1

against through slavery. Obviously, that's true. But Asian Americans also have been discriminated

0:57.7

against. Japanese Americans, 110,000 of them, approximately, were rounded up and put in detention

1:04.2

centers during the Second World War as the result of an edict by the American military supported,

1:10.6

not only by liberal President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but by a liberal Supreme Court in a

1:16.0

decision written by one of its most liberal members. You go black. So you can't

1:22.8

really solve problems of past discrimination against one group by discriminating against

1:32.1

another group. The betting odds by experts is that this Supreme Court, unlike past Supreme

1:38.5

courts, will almost certainly strike down the Harvard plan and require that race not be considered

1:46.9

explicitly as a factor in admission and that no floor ceilings quotas really are constitutionally

1:55.2

permissible. Now, schools will find ways of circumventing that holding, my former colleague

2:01.0

Professor Lawrence Tribe, has already said that Harvard and other elite institutions will figure

2:05.9

out a way of getting around the holding of the Supreme Court, not something I think a constitutional

2:10.8

law scholar should ever advocate circumventing a Supreme Court decision. But universities will

2:16.8

do so. They'll try to find ways of maintaining essentially a quota system based on race

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.