Does affirmative action discriminate against Asians
The Dershow
Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media
4.4 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 2 June 2022
⏱️ 31 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the Dershow. Today I want to talk about affirmative action, particularly |
| 0:05.8 | race-specific affirmative action. The United States Supreme Court has before it a very |
| 0:10.6 | interesting case growing out of my own university, the one I taught at 50 years. The claim |
| 0:17.7 | by Asian American applicants and others litigating on their behalf is that Harvard's admission |
| 0:26.9 | process by discriminating in favor of African American and certain other ethnic groups implicitly |
| 0:34.8 | discriminates against Asian Americans. In other words, by putting a floor below which African |
| 0:42.8 | American admissions can't go, they in fact impose a ceiling on the number of Asian Americans |
| 0:48.9 | who will be admitted. Now, African Americans say historically they've been discriminated |
| 0:53.1 | against through slavery. Obviously, that's true. But Asian Americans also have been discriminated |
| 0:57.7 | against. Japanese Americans, 110,000 of them, approximately, were rounded up and put in detention |
| 1:04.2 | centers during the Second World War as the result of an edict by the American military supported, |
| 1:10.6 | not only by liberal President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but by a liberal Supreme Court in a |
| 1:16.0 | decision written by one of its most liberal members. You go black. So you can't |
| 1:22.8 | really solve problems of past discrimination against one group by discriminating against |
| 1:32.1 | another group. The betting odds by experts is that this Supreme Court, unlike past Supreme |
| 1:38.5 | courts, will almost certainly strike down the Harvard plan and require that race not be considered |
| 1:46.9 | explicitly as a factor in admission and that no floor ceilings quotas really are constitutionally |
| 1:55.2 | permissible. Now, schools will find ways of circumventing that holding, my former colleague |
| 2:01.0 | Professor Lawrence Tribe, has already said that Harvard and other elite institutions will figure |
| 2:05.9 | out a way of getting around the holding of the Supreme Court, not something I think a constitutional |
| 2:10.8 | law scholar should ever advocate circumventing a Supreme Court decision. But universities will |
| 2:16.8 | do so. They'll try to find ways of maintaining essentially a quota system based on race |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

