Welcome to the inquiry with me, Tanya Beckett, one question for expert witnesses and an answer.

In November, Britain will host the next UN Climate Change Conference, otherwise known as COP26.

Some 200 countries will come together to try to speed up attempts to make the world

carbon neutral by the middle of the century. But many countries are already struggling to ramp up

renewable energy sufficiently to meet their greenhouse emission reduction targets.

So is there another answer out there?

Around a tenth of the world's electricity is generated by nuclear reactors.

Global generation has slowed in recent years after the nuclear accident in Fukushima a decade ago,

prompted governments to take a more cautious stance. But with the urgent need to reduce carbon

emissions, many prominent environmentalists are now taking another look at nuclear energy.

So this week we're asking, do we need to build more nuclear power stations to help deal with climate change?

Germany, in common with many industrialized countries, began to develop nuclear power in the late 1950s,

amid an era of hope for a cleaner future for electricity.

It was the kind of energy for the future without dust, without coal, without all the terrible things.

Our first expert witness, Deutscheweller journalist Jens Turau, explains how hopes for the potential of nuclear power in Germany

faded in the face of public opposition.

Germany's anti-nuclear movement can be traced back almost as far as the firing up of the country's

first commercial reactor in 1969. It was a big debate in the history of Germany,

while nuclear power is a good idea. But it changed in the 70s when the so-called social movements

in Germany came up. There was a lot of big demonstrations all over Germany, especially at the

town, at that time, in Lower Saxony, Gorleben, where the government planned to build a central

repository. Gorleben is a town situated in a part of Germany, which at that time was on the northern

...