Do Algorithms Get a Pass Under Section 230?
Cato Podcast
Cato Institute
4.5 • 979 Ratings
🗓️ 8 February 2023
⏱️ 15 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the Kator Daily Podcast for Wednesday, February 8th, 2023. |
| 0:07.0 | I'm Caleb Brown. A case going before the US Supreme Court aims to answer some |
| 0:11.0 | questions about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. |
| 0:14.8 | Specifically, when an algorithm serves you a suggested video, can the providers of those videos |
| 0:20.0 | be held liable for what happens afterward? Cato's Tommy Berry discusses the case and what it might mean for freedom and accountability |
| 0:27.1 | on the internet. |
| 0:28.3 | This is a highly fraught issue and it has scrambled a lot of sort of traditional ideas about what individuals should be allowed to say, |
| 0:39.0 | what companies ought to be able to do, what those associations ought to be. What is this case about with |
| 0:45.2 | respect to Section 230? |
| 0:47.9 | So this case is a little bit different from any Section 230 case we've seen before. Typically fights over Section 230 |
| 0:55.2 | are about whether websites have immunity for things that they host, for the mere |
| 1:00.6 | fact that they're hosting it. This is a lawsuit raising a new and different theory for why |
| 1:07.4 | Section 230 should not apply. This is a lawsuit claiming that algorithmic recommendations are not protected by |
| 1:16.3 | Section 230. So the specific facts of this case, the plaintiffs are relatives or victims of people in the 2015 Paris terrorist attack perpetrated by ISIS. |
| 1:29.0 | Their claim is that ISIS recruitment was aided and abetted by YouTube owned by Google |
| 1:35.8 | and that essentially, you know, we've all fallen into that YouTube rabbit hole where |
| 1:39.7 | you watch one video and then you see it, five more videos like it on the bar on the right. |
| 1:44.8 | The claim here is that you can fall into a dark rabbit hole if you start watching |
| 1:49.0 | radicalization videos and see more on the right. And so the claim is that essentially those |
| 1:54.5 | algorithms that put similar videos in the bar to the right of your screen is |
| 2:00.3 | essentially a recommendation by the website and that a recommendation is not protected by Section 230. |
| 2:06.5 | All right, so we're familiar, you and I are familiar with algorithms serving us content even on Facebook among our friends we don't |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

