This is your drive time newsblast.

30 minutes jam-packed with up-to-the-minute news

from a perspective of truth, liberty, and justice

every weekday.

This is Monica Perrett.

I'm Brad Binklin.

Today's top story, the art of ambiguity enters the impeachment investigation.

Finally.

Yes, finally, the European Ambassador Sandland revised his testimony to say that having heard other people's testimony, he now realizes that his testimony was more like theirs than he had first realized and he wanted to revise it.

The way they're presenting it is that he rewrote that there was more of a feeling of quid pro quo that he thought there

was a quid pro quo afoot.

But he also says that he doesn't know where he got that impression because when he actually

spoke to the president, the president said, using the phrase that now has become unbelievably popular.

No, one of them used the phrase no quid pro quo.

I think maybe it was in the text between Sunland and the other guy.

Yeah.

And they just said, okay, so, but but Trump said I don't want anything I just

want them to do the right thing that's all well he didn't actually admit

to quid pro quo as the media would make you think he did.

The media, according to them, he came back and made a statement that completely undermined

and destroyed Trump's defense and is a smoking gun.

But when you actually read it, what he said was, I do remember I had a conversation on,

...