Sooner or later, you realize the news was lying to you the whole time.

We have something I like to call the three-day rule.

I think many people call it the three-day rule.

When you hear a story accusing Donald Trump of some kind of like very serious war crime or

the people around him, you got to wait three days.

Get away three days because it turns out almost always

fake. And that brings us to this big story that was breaking over the past couple of days.

And that was the claim that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered the double tap killing

of these narco-terrorists bringing drugs into the country. The story was that there was a strike on a boat,

and then the dudes that were on that boat were clinging to the wreckage, suffering.

And they claimed that Hegseth said, fire again, killing them.

The killing of survivors after a strike is considered a war crime.

Well, as it turns out, the story is fake.

And the New York Times is now disputing reporting from the Washington Post.

But there are questions not just in, why is the media lying to us about everything?

Because I can put it this way.

If you're on the right, you're going like, oh, wow, the New York Times has just proved the Washington Post wrong. I trust them. If you're on the left, you're going, no way. The New York Times is lying. The Washington Post was right. Why is the New York Times defending Pete, Exeth? Well, I think likely the Washington Post is wrong. I think the New York Times is likely correct because

Hegsetth denied this in the first place. And now I believe the New York Times has five

sources all saying he never came back and gave them more orders. He said, target the

narco terrorists and he left, which kind of makes the most sense. Like Hagseth walked back in and

said, what happened? Like, well, they're still alive. Kill them again.

You know, fire again.

...