Delphi: Richard Allen’s Defense Calls The State’s Case a Paper Tiger
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Tony Brueski
4.2 • 612 Ratings
🗓️ 5 May 2026
⏱️ 19 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Richard Allen’s appellate defense team filed a reply brief and motion for oral arguments before the Indiana Court of Appeals, characterizing the State’s case as “superficial inference stacking” built on “tunnel vision into the wrong man.” Attorneys Stacy Uliana and Mark Leeman wrote that “the State’s case was a paper tiger, and the trial court systematically barred Allen from lighting a match.”
The defense’s reply responds to the State’s brief filed in March, which argued Allen’s conviction should stand and characterized each alleged error as “harmless.” The defense counters that the cumulative effect of the exclusions denied Allen his Sixth Amendment right to present a complete defense.
Key procedural issues include the admissibility of Allen’s confessions, made during conditions the defense describes as producing psychosis. In one statement, Allen described shooting the victims, who were never shot. The defense was allowed to show video of Allen in solitary confinement but was required to mute the audio. The State’s expert characterized the confessions as logical while jurors could not hear what the defense describes as confused ramblings.
The defense also challenges the exclusion of alternative suspect evidence, including an individual whose interview was allegedly recorded over and whose weapon was never collected. Kegan Kline’s catfish account — the last to contact one of the victims — was ruled a separate investigation.
The motion for oral arguments is procedurally significant. The three-judge panel will decide whether to hear the case in person.
Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski take listener questions on the legal standards governing this appeal, the implications of the defense’s “paper tiger” characterization, and the appellate court’s range of options.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #TrueCrimeToday #Appeal #ReplyBrief #OralArguments #IndianaCourt #ConstitutionalLaw #ListenerQA #LegalAnalysis
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Drey. |
| 0:08.1 | Let's talk about Delphi for a moment. |
| 0:10.5 | Abby Williams was 13, Libby, German, was 14. |
| 0:14.2 | They went for a walk on a bridge in Delphi, Indiana. |
| 0:16.9 | If you want a case, anybody out there who's looking for a case to put some energy behind of someone wrongfully convicted, this might be it. |
| 0:25.6 | Their families have spent over nine years waiting for answers, real answers, not the one the state of Indiana has packaged for them. |
| 0:34.3 | Richard Allen is now serving 130 years for their murders, but his defense team |
| 0:39.8 | just filed their reply brief and requested something the state probably didn't want |
| 0:44.0 | oral arguments in front of a three-judge panel. They're asking the court of appeals to hear |
| 0:49.1 | this case out loud in person with all the constitutional issues laid bare. The court now decides whether to |
| 0:55.4 | grant that request and the question that keeps echoing through every filing, every exclusion, |
| 1:00.9 | every harmless error the state has invoked is this. If the evidence was really this strong, |
| 1:07.1 | why did they have to hide so much of it? And that's what we're going to get into here today. |
| 1:15.0 | Let's just start, you know, the big one that the state continues to hang their hat on and go, |
| 1:20.8 | harmless error, harmless error, but they're not even saying this is an error. They're saying his |
| 1:25.8 | confessions were completely reliable. |
| 1:28.3 | And we've talked about this a lot. |
| 1:30.2 | But if you're just joining the party of Richard Allen and the Delphi case, one of the |
| 1:34.5 | questions here he says, why did he say he shot the two girls who were never shot? |
| 1:41.9 | That's the confession they're saying is, see, see, he admitted. |
| 1:47.7 | Wouldn't a guilty person at least know how they did it? |
| 1:50.7 | Karen on an Instagram says that. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

