tonight the supreme court strikes down trump's illegal tariffs dealing his agenda a major blow

as business owners and governors demand a refund plus a potential new clue in the search for Nancy Guthrie. A couple says they found

a black glove less than a mile from her home and this one they say appears to have blood

on it. And later the new investigation into Jeffrey Epsena State, you may not know about,

his sprawling ranch in New Mexico. all tonight on laurcote's life

by my opening statement tonight for the first time in his second term the majority of the

supreme court justices made one thing clear. The system of checks and

balances is alive and well, at least for now. In a six to three decision, the court struck down

Trump's tariff's tax tariffs as illegal. Not only the decision suggests it wasn't a rubber

stamp for President Trump, it told him to stay in his executive lane.

They didn't buy the argument that Trump sweeping emergency tariffs were not taxes.

And if their taxes, sounds like Congress is laying.

Has Congress given a president some authority to impose tariffs?

Yes.

Did Congress give him total authority and hand their powers over?

No. I don't usually do this, but I want story time. Because part of Justice Neil Gorsuch's

concurring opinion makes it crystal clear about what this is really about. Not just whether a president

can slap on tariffs by first declaring an emergency or even

how much deference the president deserves, but how much power a president should have,

according to the Constitution, and why decisions this important are supposed to go through Congress,

not one person. This is the last paragraph of his 46-page concurrence. For those who think it

important for the nation to impose more tariffs, I understand that today's decision will be

...