meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Commentary Magazine Podcast

Deferential No More

The Commentary Magazine Podcast

Commentary Magazine

News Commentary, Politics, News

4.64.5K Ratings

🗓️ 1 July 2022

⏱️ 54 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Supreme Court’s final day of a consequential term ended no less consequentially. Legal scholar Adam White joins the podcast once again to break down the Court’s ruling in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency and its sweeping implications for the administrative state.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the commentary magazine daily podcast today is Friday July 1st, 2022.

0:29.6

I'm John Pudhortz, the editor of commentary magazine with me as always executive editor

0:34.0

A. Greenwald Hyde, media commentary columnist Christine Rosen, Hi Christine, and associate

0:43.2

editor Noah Rossman, Hi Noah, and for the first time in commentary podcast

0:48.6

history, we have a guest who is coming on for the second time in a week.

0:53.4

He's our Supreme Court guy, you know, some people have like a basketball guy or a movie

0:58.8

guy in their radio show.

0:59.8

Well, here we have our Supreme Court guy with the case that is at the heart and center

1:05.2

of his entire intellectual project.

1:07.3

It's Adam White of A.E.I. and the actually euphoniously named for the purposes of this

1:13.2

podcast, Boyd and Grace Center on the administrative state.

1:18.3

Is that right Adam?

1:20.4

Hi again, John.

1:22.4

It is the center for the study of the administrative state.

1:25.4

The study of the administrative state and we have the most important administrative state

1:30.9

decision coming down from the Supreme Court yesterday, which you have probably have heard,

1:38.4

is the apocalyptic decision by the Supreme Court to deny the environmental protection agency,

1:45.0

the right to control carbon emissions according to the way it is being framed by the mainstream

1:52.7

media that is not what the decision actually says, but it is a landmark in Supreme Court

2:01.4

jurisprudence in that it is an attempt now by the conservative majority on the Supreme

2:07.1

Court to codify or separate out what are the proper powers of Congress, the judiciary

2:13.6

and the executive branch, which is also what undergirds the Dobbs decision on Roe v. Wade

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Commentary Magazine, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Commentary Magazine and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.