meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3791 Ratings

🗓️ 21 May 2025

⏱️ 103 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Defense Challenges Digital Evidence: Shanon Burgess Under Intense Cross-Examination Part 1

Under rigorous cross-examination, Digital Forensics Examiner Shanon Burgess from Aperture faces tough questions from Karen Read’s defense team about his methodology and the interpretation of the Lexus vehicle’s data. Defense attorneys scrutinize his technical accuracy and objectivity, aiming to cast doubt on digital forensic conclusions. Can Burgess maintain credibility under pressure, or will the defense successfully undermine critical digital evidence in the Karen Read Retrial?

Hashtags:
#KarenReadRetrial #CrossExamination #DigitalEvidence #DefenseStrategy #CourtroomDrama #ForensicScrutiny #LegalTactics #KarenReadDefense 

 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? 

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reed.

0:09.6

Whatever you're ready, Mr. Leslie.

0:11.4

Thank you, Your Honor.

0:16.1

Good afternoon, Mr. Burgess.

0:17.9

Good afternoon.

0:19.8

You spell your first name, Shannon with one end. Do I have that correct?

0:23.6

Yes, that is correct. You described yourself as a digital forensic examiner, correct? Yes, that's correct. You use the term forensics often in your analysis.

0:38.3

Yes, it is.

0:39.3

And would you agree that generally the accepted definition of forensics is something that relates to that's used in and is suitable for a court of law.

0:55.0

Yes, I would.

0:57.0

And so when you're working in forensics, even in your office, you understand that eventually

1:06.0

it's very likely that whatever work you're working on is going to end up or could end up in a court of

1:11.6

law, correct? Correct. And you mentioned in your direct examination the scientific method,

1:19.0

right? Correct. And I was pleased to hear mention of the scientific method. And I just want to

1:25.7

cover some principles with regard to the scientific method. But before

1:31.5

I do, I just want to see how forensics envelopes in certain items. So forensics applies

1:40.7

scientific methods and principles to legal matters, particularly in criminal investigations, right?

1:49.0

Correct.

1:50.0

So fair statement.

1:51.0

Yes. Thank you.

1:52.0

And forensics are used to help lawyers in their preparation, correct?

1:59.0

Yes, I've been correct. And it's used to help judges in courts of law?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.