meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Defenders Podcast

Defenders: Excursus on Natural Theology (Part 22): The Moral Argument Part 5

Defenders Podcast

William Lane Craig

Christianity, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy

4.7724 Ratings

🗓️ 8 September 2022

⏱️ 33 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Defenders, the teaching class of Dr. William Lane Craig, today, and excurses on natural theology, part 22.

0:13.1

For more resources from Dr. Craig, go to reasonable faith.org.

0:17.9

Last week, I was at Ohio State University for a veritas forum, which turned out to be

0:24.4

unexpectedly significant. I had a debate scheduled with an atheist philosophy professor at OSU

0:32.6

named Kevin Sharp, and the subject was, is there evidence for God? And I thought, like most of these

0:38.8

veritas form events, that this would be a sort of friendly dialogue, where we would each speak

0:45.7

for 15 minutes, and then we would have a moderated conversation. Well, I have not experienced

0:53.2

such ferocity in a critic since I had those dialogues with Lawrence

0:58.2

Krause in Australia.

1:00.9

And Kevin Sharp had prepared very, very well for this dialogue.

1:08.8

He made a point of letting me know before the event began that he had listened

1:14.6

to all eight years of our reasonable faith podcasts, all of them. And he was familiar with the

1:22.6

debate with Sean Carroll, with Alex Rosenberg, as well as other material. And he had PowerPoints and charts to show,

1:32.3

went a mile a minute, and attacked not only the six arguments that I presented in my opening

1:38.3

statement, but all the other arguments I've ever presented anywhere. So it was really a very good contest. Many people have asked me,

1:48.7

what would it be like if you were to have a debate with someone who really took the time to

1:54.4

prepare? Well, this is your chance to find out, because this is going to be on YouTube as soon as

2:00.0

it's edited, and I think that it will be a great

2:03.6

tool for dissecting and talking about hitting the pause button replaying, thinking about it.

2:11.6

It was a very substantive discussion and I'll say something more about the content of it later on in the class today because

2:18.0

I want that to be part of the podcast because we can benefit from Sharpe's critique of all

2:25.0

of my arguments.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from William Lane Craig, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of William Lane Craig and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.