Okay, ladies and gentlemen, we are back and it is question and answer time. You guys provide the questions from back at home and I provide the answer. So let's dive right into it. Question number one.

How should I respond when people say that abortion is necessary for miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy care?

Pretty simple answer here, Dana. You should respond by telling them that they're just plainly wrong. This is some weird conspiracy or propaganda that's gotten out. I think from the left and they believe that an ectopic pregnancy is treated by an abortion. It's not or that a miscarriage is treated by an abortion. It's not obviously a miscarriage when your body naturally, let's go of the pregnancy and you can actually debunk this by giving them plant parenthood links right on the plant parenthood website. It says plainly that the procedure is to take

care of an ectopic pregnancy is not an abortion. So again, you just have to kind of conquer the fiction with the facts. Next question. Can people be Christian or Catholic and be pro choice? Can people be Christian and Catholic and worship Satan? Can people be Christian and Catholic and not believe in Jesus Christ? The answer is obviously no. I find it super bizarre that there are people that believe that these two ideas can come together that these two ideologies can come together. No, obviously.

The Bible is pro life and it would never ever ever celebrate the sacrifice of children nine months in the womb in order to support a woman who just wants to go further in her career or whatever the personal reasons may be.

They're in complete conflict with one another as are many of the things that we're seeing today and people somehow think I'm a Christian, but I'm a Christian, but no, you're either a Christian or you're not a Christian.

And if not a Christian, then say that, but don't think that you can somehow balance these two things together abortion is antithetical to the Bible. Next question. How to deal with people saying that quote, banning abortions will only ban safe abortions and quotes.

This is the myth of the back alley abortions, which is something that again, if you visit the Planned Parenthood website, you will find has been debunked. There's some weird idea out there that women tens of thousands of them were dying per year because they were having using coat hangers to try to self abort babies from their room and that just isn't the case at all.

Even the Washington Post has done a piece debunking this so you can research it whether it's left or right media. The truth is that and this is according to the Planned Parenthood website in 1965 before so that's before the passing of of Roe v Wade.

There were approximately 193 deaths that were attributable to abortion and of those 193 deaths, 70% of them were performed by physicians so far from being a back alley abortion that involved the coat hanger.

The majority of them were being done by physicians so this again is just a huge myth and I believe that its origins were in a propaganda campaign against the Catholic Church when abortion issue was obviously waging in the United States and they said, well, just going to say that 10 to thousands of women are dying in back alley abortions.

If you use those numbers that means approximately in 1965, 58 women died not seeing a doctor having an abortion and I do not see how any person can look you in the face and tell you that 58 women dying because they wanted to get abortions and maybe went through dire measures to get one justifies the slaughter of approximately 890,000 babies per year which is what we have today. It's just nonsensical.

Alright, next question. I am pro life for the most part but I don't think a woman should be forced to give birth to a baby that was conceived through rape or incest. Could you share your thoughts on that?

First and foremost, my thoughts on this is that what you will find is that when people cannot reasonably come up with an argument when they can't rationally come up with an argument, they pursue extremes.

So an extreme is 99% of abortions are taking place because people just don't want to be inconvenienced by a baby but less than 1% of people are being raped and are becoming pregnant and I'm going to use that less than 1% thing that that thing that basically never happens because I don't want to talk about the other 99% and it drives me crazy.

Obviously, there's never going to be a perfect law. There's always going to be extreme circumstances and I'm fortunate circumstances like what you're talking about in terms of incest and rape. But regarding either of them and particularly rape, you have to ask yourself this question.

Do you believe that a child should suffer because of the sins of their father? Because that's what we're talking about when you say that a child, a sentient being that we know how drastic the procedure of abortion is.

But they are being poisoned that when they have taken out, they are being ripped limb from limb. These babies can feel they have feelings.

And do you believe that that baby is worthy of that because of the sins of its father? So I'm just going to answer that question by asking you a question back and letting you think on it.

Next question.

I need a way to respond to the argument, you can't be pro-gun and pro-life. I think the best way to respond to that argument is by handing them a constitution. I mean, I haven't even understood the conflation of the gun debate and the pro-life debate. It makes entirely no sense.

But how can you say you're not pro-life because you believe that people should be able to defend themselves in circumstances against actual predators? What does the killing of an innocent life in the womb have anything to do with if somebody breaks into my home and I grab a gun and I shoot them?

...