meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Astrology Podcast

Deborah Houlding and Whole Sign House Denialism

The Astrology Podcast

Chris Brennan

Religion & Spirituality, Society & Culture, Philosophy, Spirituality

4.7 • 1.7K Ratings

🗓️ 10 February 2023

⏱️ 402 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In episode 386 Chris Brennan addresses a controversial lecture that was recently given by Deborah Holding where she denied the historical existence of the whole sign house system in ancient astrology. Holding claims that whole sign houses did not exist in ancient astrology, and that the concept was only invented in the 1990s by Robert Hand and Robert Schmidt of Project Hindsight. Chris sets out to present evidence that contradicts Holding's claims, demonstrating that there is ample evidence for the existence of whole sign houses in ancient astrology, and to provide a commentary on the distortions and misrepresentations made in her lecture. During the course of the commentary Chris emphasizes the importance of separating the historical debate from the current practice of astrology, and criticizes Holding for denying the historical existence of whole sign houses based on personal preferences rather than objective evidence. Chris also discusses the concept of whole sign house denialism, which is the attempt to deny the existence of whole sign houses in ancient astrology and dismiss or suppress any historical evidence that it existed, as well why it is important to address false claims in order to set the historical record straight. This is a recording of a livestream that was broadcast on February 9, 2023. It is best to watch the video version on YouTube, because there are lots of visual elements, although most of the information is contained in the audio. This episode is available in both audio and video versions below. Timestamps 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:24 Houlding's lecture details 00:02:36 Houlding’s claims summarized 00:03:09 Her central false claim: 'Zero' historical astrologers 00:05:14 Whole sign house denialism 00:08:45 History vs. contemporary practice 00:11:36 Reconciling house systems 00:13:27 Why this response is necessary 00:16:30 History of the debate 00:19:43 Responding to the lecture release 00:21:31 Scholarly refutations of Houlding 00:24:43 Rhetorical question for the audience 00:27:02 Commentary and fair use 00:29:02 Further resources on house division 00:33:35 The 'sneak diss' tactic 00:37:50 Commentary begins 00:40:10 Houlding quotes Co–Star 00:43:17 Claim: Whole sign houses didn't exist pre-90s 00:48:19 Popularity of whole sign houses 00:53:25 Dismissing Equal Houses 00:58:32 The 'psychology' behind the movement 01:03:33 Houlding’s principal claim & James Holden 01:09:55 James Holden’s 1982 paper 01:14:00 Ancient sources defining whole sign houses 01:22:42 Examples of ancient horoscopes 01:27:26 Dorotheus of Sidon’s use 01:30:03 Project Hindsight coins the term 01:40:41 Vettius Valens’ chart examples 01:49:52 Precursors: German & French astrologers 02:00:23 Medieval Islamic tradition 02:11:00 The traditional astrology revival 02:16:40 Tensions between Lilly revivalists & Project Hindsight 02:22:48 Robert Hand’s background 02:31:52 Robert Schmidt’s background 02:44:53 Mischaracterizing Project Hindsight 03:00:34 Robert Zoller's split from Project Hindsight 03:10:52 Project Hindsight’s broad interests 03:22:53 Debunking Project Hindsight’s alleged narrow focus 03:36:34 Core Argument: Zero evidence 03:47:48 Houlding's conceptual argument 04:00:34 False claim: Valens only used quadrant houses 04:07:34 Calculating the Midheaven from the Ascendant 04:17:12 Schmidt’s theory: Topics vs. strength 04:24:43 The edited Robert Schmidt clip 04:52:46 Misrepresenting Valens’ Book 9 05:07:42 Valens' definition of Equal Houses 05:22:53 Presentation of chart diagrams 05:46:42 Dismissal of the Indian tradition 06:01:28 Wade Caves’ conceptual argument 06:18:02 Conclusion: 'It’s not a real system' 06:26:50 Final thoughts and conclusion 06:33:35 Astrologers and historical research 06:40:05 Rob Hand quote on evaluating ancient astrology 06:45:03 Final conclusions and moving forward 06:54:57 Saturn-Neptune correlation Watch the Video Version of This Episode The video recording of this livestream is available on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01IFZSjAoP0 - Transcript A full transcript of this episode is available: Episode 386 transcript Listen to the Audio Version of This Episode Listen to the audio version of this episode or download it as an MP3:

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Alright, hey everybody, thanks for joining me for this live stream tonight.

0:16.7

So hopefully it's coming through okay and everybody can hear me.

0:20.1

This is going to be kind of a long and unique live stream where I'm going to be talking

0:25.2

about Deborah Holdings' recent talk on the Holesign Houses where she denied the historical

0:33.4

existence of Holesign Houses in ancient astrology and then also claimed that it was invented

0:41.5

sometime recently in the 1990s by Robert Hand and Robert Schmidt and other members of

0:47.3

Project Hindsight.

0:49.2

So I'm going to be presenting evidence today that just shows that that's not true and

0:54.6

that there's lots of evidence to the contrary and also going through and providing commentary,

0:59.6

like an extended commentary on a number of other things that were stated in that talk

1:04.4

that were distortions or misrepresented representations or in some instances just outright fabrications.

1:15.7

So it's going to be kind of a long discussion tonight but let's buckle up and get right

1:22.8

into it.

1:23.8

Alright, so let me first show, first start by showing my slides and I need to give a lot

1:35.5

of like introductory statements so I prepared some like PowerPoint presentations just

1:41.0

to make sure I get some of the main points before we get into the commentary.

1:45.0

So this lecture that Holdings gave was titled The Sign, The Holesign, and Nothing but

1:49.7

The Sign, really.

1:51.9

It was given at the Astrological Association of Great Britain's annual conference back in

1:56.6

September, actually on September 24th, 2022, starting around 12.30 pm, I believe,

2:02.9

London time, and actually interestingly, if you look up the chart for that time, perhaps

2:08.1

relevant, is Transiting Mercury was retrograde opposite Neptune while the moon was applying

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Chris Brennan, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Chris Brennan and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.