meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
We the People

Debating the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage arguments

We the People

National Constitution Center

News, News Commentary, History

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 29 April 2015

⏱️ 45 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The National Constitution Center's Jeffery Rosen is joined by John Eastman and Paul M. Smith to break down the historic arguments about same-sex marriage in the Supreme Court this week.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Jeffrey Rosen, President and CEO of the National Constitution Center, and welcome to the latest of our We the People constitutional podcasts.

0:09.0

The National Constitution Center is the only institution in America chartered by Congress to disseminate

0:14.8

information about the U.S. Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.

0:19.8

And today we are discussing what could be the most important constitutional ruling of the term,

0:26.0

if not of the past decade, and that is the question of whether the Constitution requires states to recognize same-sex marriage.

0:36.0

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in what could be once in a generation case for the non-justices, and it posed two questions.

0:46.0

First, does the Constitution require states to recognize same-sex marriages,

0:51.0

and second, does it compel states to recognize same-sex marriages? And second, does it compel states to recognize same-sex

0:54.7

marriages legally recognized in other states? Joining us are two of the leading

1:01.5

scholars and advocates on this issue.

1:04.5

Both of them were in the courtroom yesterday,

1:07.7

and we are thrilled to welcome them

1:10.3

to our We The People constitutional podcasts.

1:14.7

Paul M Smith is chair of the appellate and Supreme Court

1:17.9

practice and co-chair of the media and First Amendment

1:20.8

and election law and redistricting practices at Genran Block.

1:25.0

Paul has argued 16 cases before the Supreme Court and among his most important victories

1:29.9

is Lawrence versus Texas, the landmark Gereright's case from 2003 that could prove

1:35.5

central to the court's decision on marriage equality. John Eastman is Henry

1:40.8

Salvatore Professor of Law and Community Service at Chapman University's Fowler School of Law.

1:46.0

He also served as the school's dean.

1:49.0

John is the founding director of the Constitutional Jurisprudence Clinic, a public interest law firm affiliated with the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.