David Responds to Trolls

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 7 March 2024

⏱️ 73 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

David takes the first ten minutes to respond to Twitter trolls over his latest New York Times article before he and Sarah revisit their arguments over the Supreme Court’s per curium ruling on the Trump-Colorado case. The Agenda: —Defending the Supreme Court —Erasing the Constitution —Confusion over the Trump ruling —Consequentialism vs. originalism —Judicial restraint and originalism —Erasing Chevron —SCOTUS hears bump stock case —Explaining the string cheese factors Show Notes: -Kevin Williamson: Slate Publishes Gun-Control Fiction -Advisory Opinions Episode with Professor Amanda Tyler Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Are you ready for a Monzo business bank account? It's made to help you navigate cash flow and tax season.
0:06.0	Perfect for bosses with a growing business, freelancers searching for financial freedom,
0:12.0	side hustlers juggling 9-5s with 5-9s, and over 350,000 businesses
0:16.9	already with us.
0:19.0	Sell through your business banking.
0:20.9	Apply for an account in minutes. Search Monzo Business.
0:24.0	Tees and sees apply.
0:25.0	Soul traders or limited company directors in the UK can apply.
0:30.0	Ready?
0:31.0	I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions.
0:48.0	Advisory opinions.
0:49.6	I'm Sarah Asger, that's David French,
0:51.4	and yeah, we're just, let's see where we go.
0:54.6	David, right off the bat, you had a headline in the New York Times that,
1:00.4	frankly even I took issue with with but so did Twitter.
1:03.0	Will you read us the headline?
1:05.0	Yes, I will read you the headline.
1:08.0	The headline is a very subtle and nuanced so I can understand why people took issue with it because it just
1:15.8	didn't state a point of view very clearly. The Supreme Court just erased part of the Constitution
1:22.3	is the headline.
1:23.0	Okay, so here's the criticism in the largest, you know, sort of highest level form.
1:29.5	We have a podcast dedicated to explaining an institution and why it's not
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.