meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophy Bites

David Edmonds on Peter Singer's Shallow Pond Thought Experiment

Philosophy Bites

Nigel Warburton

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.52K Ratings

🗓️ 5 October 2025

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this interview of the Philosophy Bites podcast Nigel Warburton interviews David Edmonds about Peter Singer's famous thought experient about what you would do if you saw a child at risk of drowning in a shallow pond, and what the moral implications of that. David has recently published a book about this thought experiment called Death in a Shallow Pond.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Philosophy Bytes with me David Edmonds and me Nigel Warburton.

0:06.2

Philosophy Bites is available at www. www.com.

0:10.9

A thought experiment involving a drowning child is one of the most famous in moral philosophy

0:15.8

and arguably the most influential. A book has just been written about it. I should know as I wrote it.

0:23.4

Here Nigel questions me about the origins and significance of and the problems with the so-called shallow pond.

0:29.7

David Edmonds, welcome to Philosophy Bites. Thank you for inviting me.

0:34.0

The topic we're going to talk about today is the shallow pond, the thought experiment of

0:39.2

the shallow pond. Could you just outline what that is? You're to imagine that you are on your

0:45.2

way to work. You're wearing a nice suit and very expensive shoes and you walk past a pond where you see a small child struggling you look around to see

0:57.4

where the parents are where the guardian is there's nobody there you're about to wait in to save this

1:02.6

child when you suddenly think about your extremely expensive shoes and you think shoes or child that's the

1:09.2

shallow pond thought experiment does anybody seriously think shoes or child, that's the shallow pond thought experiment. Does anybody seriously think

1:12.2

shoes or child in that situation? Well, that's the point. It's a rhetorical question. Nobody's

1:17.3

supposed to think, oh, I should worry about my shoes, which I haven't got time to take off and let

1:22.6

the child die. And the point is that the person who comes up with this thought experiment says that we are in a shallow pond thought experiment every day of our lives.

1:32.3

Every day you and I privileged people in the West with disposable income are effectively walking past a shallow pond and we could be saving lives.

1:41.8

So that person is Peter Singer, the philosopher Peter Singer,

1:45.1

who's been a guest on Philosophy Bites several times. Why does he think we're walking past

1:50.0

children drowning? Because we're not, literally. So he comes up with this thought experiment in 1971.

1:56.1

It's the time of the war of liberation in Bangladesh. So East Pakistan, what we now call Bangladesh, is

2:02.6

breaking up from West Pakistan. There's a terrible civil war. Millions of people are flooding

2:07.5

across the border from Bangladesh to India. And they're emaciated, they're diseased,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nigel Warburton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nigel Warburton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.