The following podcast contains advertising.

To access an ad-free version of the Lawfair Podcast,

become a material supporter of Lawfair at Patreon.com slash Lawfair. That's Patreon.com

slash Lawfair. Also check out Lawfair's other podcast offerings, rational security, chatter, lawfare no bull, and the aftermath.

The last few years have been tough on all of us, not least on our finances.

On the Pension Confident Podcast, we talk about money matters in a simple and honest way

to keep your finances on track even when money pressures are

getting you down. Maybe money worries are affecting your mental health or maybe

you're curious about the impact your relationship might be having on your bank balance.

So download the Pension Comfort Podcast on your podcast app today to hear all our episodes so far

and subscribe so you never miss an upcoming episode.

So in crafting remedies we want to establish substantive protections for consumers data and here's what I mean.

In the health privacy cases and GoodRX and Better Health and Premam, our orders didn't allow

sharing of sensitive health data so long as consumers consented to it, the orders

banned it altogether. In X- Mode and in-market, the orders didn't allow those companies to sell

or disclose precise location information so long as they obtained

consumers consent, it was banned.

And then in another case, or a recent Rite Aid matter, a case in which we alleged that a company

had recklessly deployed facial recognition technology,

the order we obtained included a five-year ban on the use of any facial recognition or

surveillance system.

So, you know, when we're crafting remedies, you know, we

...