So you know going into next week, one of the stories that will eventually come out, Monday or Tuesday,

is the Giants are going to make their decision at quarterback.

Last week, or earlier this week, technically, Brian Daibold, for the very first time, opened up to the possibility of a quarterback change going into the buy by saying everybody's going to be evaluated.

He had never said that about Daniel Jones.

It had always been Daniel's our guy, Daniels our guy, Daniels our guy. And I think both of us, you and I, Tiki,

took those words as, oh, they're definitely making a quarterback change. Right. I mean, why else

be non-committal? Yeah. Because for every single other week that someone asked the question

about Daniel Jones, it was Daniels gives us the best chance to win.

It was a rote response. And so when you don't hear it, you have to expect that there's going to be some kind of change.

And that is certainly my expectation. Now, Diana Rusini, who's a great reporter, she's worked for the athletics.

She used to work for ESPN, but a great football reporter. I made a lot of news last year with some breaking stories around the Jets, which pretty much all turned out to be true,

did a radio interview in the last couple of hours and was asked about the Giants quarterback

situation and Daniel Jones and said this. So they've got this injury guarantee for next year

and they got to make a decision

right now. Are we done with him and we want to save this money or do we go to Drew Locke? And at this

point from what I've been hearing in the conversations I've had, Daniel Jones may be staying

as the starting quarterback here for a few more weeks.

I'm not sure if this is completely done.

We're going to know more this weekend, though, when they come back from their buy and they meet with their quarterbacks.

So what happened with the reporting?

By the way, that's enough, and that's from the Dan Levitard show.

What do you think of that?

...