Will Skodes remove the threat of Trump or be as political and corrupt as Bush v Gore was?

Donald Trump is a threat to America.

His loyalty to Putin also makes him a threat to world peace as he just showed us by

killing the Senate bill to secure the border and provide aid to Taiwan, Ukraine, Israel, and the

Palestinians in Gaza.

And today the Supreme Court will have an ability to remove that threat by simply

following the plain language of the US Constitution that says people who have

engaged in insurrection or provided aid in comfort to same can't hold public office.

So what can we expect?

Will the court follow the law?

They certainly haven't in the past, and it appears that at the least, Clarence Thomas

again has no intent of following the law and

recusing himself even though his wife was personally involved in the

insurrection. Nor will Roberts, Kavanaugh, or Koney Barrett, even though all three helped George W Bush's legal team argue

his case before the court in 2000 and were rewarded with their own seats on that body.

The last time the Supreme Court inserted itself into a presidential election was

2000, when multiple members of the court had clear conflicts of interest that, like Thomas

today, they chose to ignore to hand the election

to George W Bush even though Al Gore won the election both in the popular vote

and the Electoral College. For the record it's important to remember that history as

it appears may be about to

Excuse me for the record it's important to remember that history as it appears history may be about to repeat itself.

...