Do the rich dudes want the court to ban Trump or not?

This Thursday the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Trump v

Anderson which will determine whether Trump can appear on the ballot and hold

office if elected or if he's disqualified by virtue of his having incited an

insurrection on January 6th. The really fascinating part of

this whole drama though will have to do with the power politics behind the

Thrones on the court. Now that several of the Republican justices have been so heavily saturated with

fat-cap money and thus regularly vote in favor of their morbidly rich friends.

What do those rich dudes want out of Thomas Roberts Alito Gorsuch and their other investments?

Do they want their totees on the court to keep Trump off the ballot because he's more likely to lose against Biden than his Haley or somebody else. Or like Fritz Tyson in

Germany in 1933, do they still think they can control him and he'll give them

more tax breaks and deregulation and anything else they want if they just help

become president again. While political and legal commentators will be

hyper-focused on the arguments made for and against Trump being able to stay on the ballot. I'll be

looking for any indications that at least a few of the justices may be

peeling off from Trump because they're sugardaddies are concerned about

his electability or erratic behavior.

Trump's defense has largely been confined to a few technical points.

The 14th Amendment says that any person who's acting, quote,

as a member of Congress or as an officer of the United States,

and quote, will be barred if they engage in or have, quote,

given aid or comfort, end quote, to an insurrection.

...