This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reed.

All right, Mr. Leslie, I'll hear you.

You are unmuted.

Thank you, Your Honor. Yesterday, Your Honor, discussed where the parties and parties were heard with regard to the issues

we have raised with regard to the timing of the May 8th report from Mr. Burgess that the defense received on May 11th.

And what I wanted to do, Your Honor, is briefly provide the information your honor asked for

yesterday, which was how much time we might need under various circumstances.

And so I wanted to take a few moments to put that in context.

It will only take me a brief amount of time to do so.

So, Your Honor, there is a timing issue, but there's most importantly a substantive issue.

I will not, of course, go into the detail of yesterday,

but the timing really does, is informed by the substantive issue.

And so with regard to the matter,

we went back and we looked at more deeply

the effect of this timing and this movement

of what has been referred to as clock drift in Mr.

Burgess's report that we got on May 11th. I spoke of the significance yesterday and

here's what I would like to add as is relevant to the time we're going to need. I again

urge the court to reject it substantively because what

we did was we went and we looked at matters such as the cross-examination of a key witness in this

case, Jennifer McCabe. She testified with regard to observing vehicles, a vehicle at 1245 a.m.

We, and that's a significant point. I know I don't need to elucidate for your honor.

...