Crash
Need To Know
Bryce Zabel
4.7 • 548 Ratings
🗓️ 16 February 2026
⏱️ 74 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In this Need to Know episode, Bryce Zabel and Richard Dolan take a deep, methodical look at the reality of UFO crash retrievals, treating the subject not as speculation but as a serious historical and structural question. Dolan draws on decades of research, particularly the work of Leonard Stringfield and other major investigators, to explain why crashes are not incompatible with advanced non-human technology. They explore early cases such as Roswell, Magenta (1933 Italy), Trinity (1945), Aztec (1948), and later incidents, arguing that a pattern of recoveries has existed far longer than most people realize. The discussion reframes the common objection that advanced craft "shouldn't crash," emphasizing traffic volume, imperfect systems, and the possibility of smaller deployed vehicles rather than interstellar motherships
The conversation then shifts to how such a secret could persist for decades, with Dolan outlining a legal and institutional framework rooted in post–World War II atomic secrecy laws. He explains how crash materials could be automatically classified, funneled into compartmentalized systems, and increasingly migrated to private contractors like Battelle, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop, limiting congressional oversight and public access. They also examine the controversial Majestic-12 recovery manual, debating whether it represents authentic documentation or sophisticated disinformation. The episode closes with reflections on the global nature of retrievals, the power struggles now emerging in Congress, and the emotional impact of the news surrounding Nick Pope's health, underscoring both the human and historical weight of the subject and why crash retrievals remain one of the most consequential unresolved issues in the UFO field
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Need to Know, news, context, and analysis about anomalous phenomena. |
| 0:12.1 | Here's some real talk from two authors who literally wrote the book on disclosure. |
| 0:17.1 | From New York, Richard Dolan. |
| 0:19.0 | From Los Angeles, Bryce Zabel. |
| 0:21.3 | Let's get started. |
| 0:22.9 | When I first heard the phrase crash retrieval, and I'm not talking about sightings or lights in the sky, but crash retrieval, something allegedly coming down and being recovered. |
| 0:33.2 | I mean, it was almost too shocking to even contemplate. |
| 0:37.4 | When I was a kid and I was aware of |
| 0:39.8 | UFOs, they were first flying saucers. They were things flying around in the sky, then UFO |
| 0:44.8 | unidentified flying objects. You thought that they were out there to be seen, to be maybe experienced, |
| 0:51.4 | but you didn't think they were anything but a mystery. Well, now it's a |
| 0:55.2 | different world. I mean, this was so fringe until really just a relatively few years ago. |
| 1:02.1 | And now we have people in Congress talking about crash retrievals, and we even have senators |
| 1:08.3 | introducing legislation about it. So it raises all kinds of questions. If the claim is |
| 1:14.1 | this enormous, what kind of evidence should we expect to see to prove it? Will we ever be |
| 1:19.1 | able to prove it? Why aren't we seeing this evidence right now? So in this episode, that's exactly |
| 1:24.1 | what we're going to look into. We're going to talk about crash retrievals. |
| 1:27.9 | We're going to take him seriously. |
| 1:29.2 | And then we'll talk about some other things later on. |
| 1:32.3 | But let's bring in my co-host, Rich Dolan. |
| 1:34.7 | Rich, good to see you again, my friend. |
| 1:37.5 | Hi, Bryce. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bryce Zabel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Bryce Zabel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

