Even the most carefully planned murders can unravel when details are overlooked, but in

the case we're discussing today, one person said the details weren't missed, they were

intentional in order to frame him. I'm Charlie and welcome to Crime Lines.

Welcome to Crime Lines. When you hear this episode, I will be packing for the studio both

and opening in North Adams, Massachusetts, and I'm looking forward to everyone who's planning

on being there. Somehow I have to manage a panel that includes both Justin from Generation Y

and Amanda from Winon Crime, and if you know them, you know that's a lot of personality,

but it's going to be a great time. Next week is my scheduled week off, but I always release a

bonus episode that week on Patreon and Apple subscriptions, so check those out if you're

interested in ad-free content and extra episodes, and if that isn't enough, go check out my new

podcast, Crime Lines and Consequences. In September, we released an episode on Sylvia Brown and her

psychic predictions related to missing persons cases, as well as an episode with L.A. not so confidential

on the research into the in-sell community and risk assessment within that group. When people

are engaging in violent rhetoric online, it doesn't mean they're going to turn violent.

So what do we know about in-sells that could help with that risk assessment? But before you go

listen to any of those things, listen to this episode first. We're going to start with the

write-out family who were at the center of this case. In January of 1993, Craig and Laura write-out

married at the ages of 26 and 21 respectively. Over the next 20 years, their family grew to include

seven children, three girls and four boys. The older six were all born close in age roughly every

two years, and then there was a gap of about six years before they had one more baby.

The family lived in Pittsburgh, New York, which is a suburb of Rochester,

Laura stayed at home with their large family, while Craig worked in IT. As he was the sole

...